We’d love your help. I am embarrassed to make a fool of myself in front of 100 bloggers when I make assertions about areas of science I don't completely understand; apparently John Horgan is not embarrassed to do it in front of what-is-the-print-run-of-the-book? This shopping feature will continue to load items when the Enter key is pressed. Il analyse également les commentaires pour vérifier leur fiabilité. This book has a fascinating premise and moments of great humor. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. A couple weeks ago I happened to be in a bookshop sale and found it again, still kind of pompous looking but with the red cover a little bleached out because of the wear and the significantly lower price; the former hesitancy immidiately turned into compassion for the abandoned book and I decided to give it a try. The author is right in suspecting that he is a bit mad. No purchase necessary to play. (Horgan calls such theories `ironic science', i.e. Das Buch wurde 1997 erstmals publiziert und vor kurzem neu aufgelegt. Horgan stands in a long line of figures who have asserted an "end of science," though he handles his argument in a manner that doesn't distract from the meat of the book, which is the interviews with philosophers and scientists. The author is sardonic, smart, yet somehow earnest. Many of the later interviews seemed like a hodgepodge of musings by scientists; some interesting, some not so interesting.

. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Mind-Body Problems: Science, Subjectivity & Who We Really Are, Voir les 100 premiers en Livres anglais et étrangers, History & Philosophy of Science (Livres anglais et étrangers), Sciences, Techniques et Médecine (Livres), Traduire tous les commentaires en français, Afficher ou modifier votre historique de navigation, Recyclage (y compris les équipements électriques et électroniques), Annonces basées sur vos centres d’intérêt.

If you are as fed up as I am with hearing people talk about "in the future" we will do this, have this, know this, and be able to do this (insert any ridiculous idea, like scan ourselves into a computer and live in virtual reality worlds forever) all because of advances in science, then this is the book for you. Great early interviews of those I have heard of though, Richard Dawkins, Karl Popper, Francis Crick, etc. While it contains a few interesting insights into the philosophy of science, too much of the book is taken up with misrepresenting or simply denying the content of its interviews with prominent scientists in order to bolster the author's specious and spurious thesis. One that I found immensely entertaining and infuriating at the same time, almost twenty-five years after it was written. Basic Books; New Edition (April 14, 2015), Reviewed in the United States on August 15, 2019. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. The End of Science is about the end of new discoveries in scientific fields more than it's about the end of science as a method of discovery. Horgan's main argument is that science is unlikely to see any more paradigm shifts-new theories in which we radically increase our understanding of the universe. Others think some questions will never be answered by our puny human brains, an. WIRED’s biggest stories delivered to your inbox.

Some are afraid humans may have reached the limits of scientific knowledge; others are confident that those limits have not yet been reached. Given this, the reality of diminishing returns imply that more and more work must be invested between each major discovery, and most of science becomes filling in details. If you read just a couple of chapters, check those on physics as well as the chaos/complexity chapters. so at there mercy of their fears and desires, as when they are confronting the limits of knowledge. Started out great and then ended okay. Horgan is more of a columnist than a reporter, and this book should be viewed more as an opinion piece than a factual report.

Des tiers approuvés ont également recours à ces outils dans le cadre de notre affichage d’annonces. Others think there are other big questions, such as consciousness, that are still waiting to be confronted.

Unfortunately I was wrong... At first I was excited to read this, as Horgan is able to write complex ideas clearly, but then about 1/3 into the book I got what he was doing. La commande 1-Click n'est pas disponible pour cet article. Addison-Wesley: (800) 358 4566, +1 (212) 463 8440. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. In THE END OF SCIENCE, Horgan displays his genius for getting these larger-than-life figures to be human, whilst also … It seems there is a simple statement at the heart of this book: "We're not going to find anything as world-altering as General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, or Darwinian Evolution in the future." John Horgan interviews many great contemporary scientists in an effort to discovery whether the age of relentless scientific progress is drawing to an end. John Horgan, a staff writer for Scientific American, asks some three dozen scientists and philosophers whether we have reached the limits of empirical scientific research, and if … Un utile panorama dello stato dell'arte dell'attività scientifica mondiale, anche se espresso in maniera talvolta( forse volutamente) superficiale e generico. Through he tried to say all kind of sciences has limitation but as expected, there's no conclusion. And now, 15 years later, it makes for interesting reading. Got it. Comunque per lo più condivisibile. Classement des meilleures ventes d'Amazon : Comment les évaluations sont-elles calculées ? Toward the end, it felt like a bunch of ramblings by scientists, half of which I’ve never even heard of. Will there be any more Albert Einsteins, Charles Darwins, or James Clerk Maxwells changing our understanding of the natural world in fundamental ways? Then why ask them?

The underlying question, one that reaches across many fields of science, is whether the "big" questions have all been answered. Given what’s at stake, one ... Read full review, Check out the new look and enjoy easier access to your favorite features, Facing The Limits Of Knowledge In The Twilight Of The Scientific Age. © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. ou ses filiales. The words of the scientists are text which Horgan annotates. Given the fundamental nature of the debate, it is fascinating that even scientists disagree on how much truth there is to Horgan's argument. Perhaps you have told your boss to take this job and shove it when leaving a job or changing careers… John Horgan wrote a whole book that reads as a long resignation letter from his profession of science writing. The conclusion the reader draws from these interviews is that there's a 50 percent chance science will end, leaving a 50 percent chance that knowledge is infinite and science is in its infancy. Horgan makes his bias clear from the outset: He believes that the scientific age is in its twilight, because we have already discovered all the major things about the world there is to know. JOHN HORGAN is a science journalist and Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey.