Chris Packham loses bid for legal challenge over HS2 31 July Environmental campaigner Chris Packham said he was "deeply disappointed" by the ruling TV naturalist Chris Packham … Packham’s solicitor, Carol Day of Leigh Day solicitors, said: “This is a very disappointing judgment. The agreement is an environmental accord adopted by many nations, including the UK. An upgraded fast route from Birmingham to Bristol Parkway carrying HS2 trains, continuing to the South West and South Wales. In January, a report by Wildlife Trusts claimed that 'huge swathes' of 'irreplaceable' natural habitats, including 39 nature reserves and 108 ancient woodlands, could be threatened by HS2, Mr Wolfe added: 'This misunderstanding affected the weight they would have given to the report's conclusions in their decision-making. Chris Packham took his case to the High Court in April seeking an emergency injunction to stop works he claimed would cause destruction or 'irreversible and irreparable loss' to ancient woodland sites. On the second, the court held that because the decision arising out of the Oakervee review was not subject to any form of statutory scheme, the government was at liberty to select the issues on which it was advised by the review and that it was not constrained by the act or by any policy of its own.

Mr Packham took his case to the High Court in April seeking an emergency injunction to stop works he claimed would cause destruction or 'irreversible and irreparable loss' to ancient woodland sites. But two senior judges refused Mr Packham permission to bring a claim against the Government's decision and did not grant the injunction. Talks continue over new curbs for parts of England, 'Millions face lockdown' amid fears for economy, 'I don't feel like dying today': Hiker meets cougar.

In written submissions, David Wolfe QC argued ministers would have proceeded with their decision on the basis the Oakervee Review (a government-commissioned report set up to examine whether and how HS2 should proceed) would have explained what they needed to know, when it did not. In written submissions to the Court of Appeal, David Wolfe QC, for Mr Packham, argued that ministers would have proceeded with making a decision on HS2 on the basis that the report from the Government-commissioned Oakervee Review would have explained what they needed to know about the environmental impacts of the project, when in fact, it did not.

The broadcaster Chris Packham has lost his case against HS2 in the court of appeal. "People now see that a scheme for a railway which will tear up the countryside so that we can shave a few minutes off a journey time, makes no sense in the contemporary workplace," he stated. Husband and surviving daughter of mummy blogger killed with three children in car crash 'will recover' from... My wife SHOULD feel guilty for not wanting to have sex with me:The jaw-dropping riposte from husband of a... Vibrating brush that changed the face of beauty (but did it do more harm than good? Announcing the court's decision, Lord Justice Coulson said: 'This application has no realistic prospect of success, so we do not grant permission to bring judicial review proceedings.'. If HS2 goes ahead, it will require the largest deforestation project this country has seen since the First World War. The Government is opposing the challenge.

In papers before the court, Mr Wolfe argued that when making the decision on HS2 the Government 'failed to have regard to the implications' to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
Our client believes this is wrong and is pursuing the possibility of an appeal.”. Send your story ideas to: newsonline.westmidlands@bbc.co.uk, .css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:link{color:inherit;}.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:visited{color:#696969;}.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:link,.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:visited{-webkit-text-decoration:none;text-decoration:none;}.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:link:hover,.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:visited:hover,.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:link:focus,.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:visited:focus{color:#B80000;-webkit-text-decoration:underline;text-decoration:underline;}.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:link::after,.css-1hlxxic-PromoLink:visited::after{content:'';position:absolute;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;left:0;z-index:2;}HS2: Chris Packham launches legal challenge to rail link, London and Essex due to move up to Covid Tier 2.

A Department for Transport spokesperson said the project was "crucial to rebuilding our economy from coronavirus" and HS2 had been tasked with "delivering one of the UK's most environmentally responsible infrastructure projects". Chris Packham is taking his fight against the HS2 high-speed rail scheme to the Court of Appeal today after losing his bid to stop the clearing of ancient woodlands. He also said Mr Packham's case is that 'the defendants were told (and so would have proceeded from an understanding) that the Oakervee Report in fact set out a sufficient account for their purposes of the environmental impacts, when in fact it had not done so'. “Obviously we are deeply disappointed by today’s ruling.

Coronavirus: What does the tier system mean for UK holidays? The enormous environmental damage that HS2 will cause is beyond doubt. 2. Video'I don't feel like dying today': Hiker meets cougar, Breonna Taylor's boyfriend recalls night she was killed. But Timothy Mould QC, acting for the government, said: "It is simply fanciful for the appellant to assume that the first respondent (the Secretary of State for Transport) knew nothing about the public legislative and procedural history of HS2, including the comprehensive assessment of environmental impacts undertaken in accordance with parliamentary procedures, beyond that which was drawn to his attention by the report itself.". Video, 'I don't feel like dying today': Hiker meets cougar, Breonna Taylor's boyfriend recalls night she was killed. 'He failed to take into account the Paris Agreement when making this decision.'. “Today is a good day for the long term future of Britain’s natural environment.”, ‘Seeing the trees being ripped down is really hard’: meet a father and son protesting against HS2. Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday & Metro Media Group. At a July hearing, lawyers for Mr Packham said a review gave an "incomplete assessment of environmental matters" which meant the government approved HS2 with a "complete misapprehension" of its environmental impact.

I, Chris Packham, am taking on HS2 to put a stop to it - for good.

Mr Wolfe said: 'The report gave a very incomplete assessment of environmental matters. 4.

By providing a cleaner, greener way to travel, HS2 will help cut the number of cars and lorries on our roads, cut demand for domestic flights, and help get Britain to net zero carbon emissions. He had argued there were failings in the way the government decided to give the project the go-ahead. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Packham believes the Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on public finances and the need for a green recovery has undone the business and environmental case for HS2. A spokesman for HS2 Ltd said it took its "commitment to the environment extremely seriously" and there was "safeguarding in place to protect wildlife and other natural assets".
He said Covid-19 had turned the country's finances and the public's attitudes towards climate change "upside down". Environmentalists say the high-speed rail project is leading to irreversible destruction of … The second was that the government failed to take account of the effect of the project on greenhouse gas emissions and global temperature rise between now and 2050, in the light of its obligations under the Paris agreement and the Climate Change Act 2008. 1.